In Which Your Humble Correspondent Muses On The State Of College Football
There are times during our lives when we are forced to confront certain contradictions which we embrace without thought most of the time. The reason we don't do it all the time is that such contradictions are uncomfortable. They're uncomfortable, because the fact that we embrace them demonstrates a certain lack of rationality on our parts.
For me, my current feelings about the state of NCAA Division I BCS football fall within that category.
As regular readers are aware, I attended the University of Missouri, known to the world as, "Mizzou." I drank deeply from the well of addictive Kool-Aid of "the old alma mater" during my undergraduate, graduate and law school years there. It starts the moment one arrives as an 18 year old freshman. You learn the history and traditions. You learn the culture. You're injected with pride in the institution and told you're now part of a wider "family" of graduates. It provides a connection with thousands of people you've never met.
Case in point: Sometime during the 1990's, I was on one of my occasional solo road trips out west, to Great Basin National Park, I think. I was taking a roundabout route, and wound up getting gas in the tiny town of Dalhart, Texas. While I was gassing up, a local in a Ford F-150 with Texas plates pulled in and was filling his tank, as well. I was looking at the rear window of his truck cab and noticed a "University of Missouri" window sticker. The driver didn't look old enough to have kids there so I took a chance and said, "M, I, Z," the first part of the quintessential Mizzou student sports cheer. He looked up at me, smiled and said, "Z, O, U." That led to a pleasant twenty minute chat about our respective times in Columbia.
So, school spirit runs deep, especially with sports, as readers of these pages will no doubt surmise. The above is especially true, viz. The University of Missouri versus the (Evil) University of Kansas. Search the term "KU Snark" below for taste or simply click here for one example.
That said, regular readers will also acknowledge, that I've been critical of big time college athletics on these pages. Back in 2007, I wrote this post, decrying the current scheme wherein young athletes are recruited to play football or basketball in exchange for scholarships, wherein few if any actually graduate. Those who don't are tossed out, having made millions for their respective universities. It's an unfortunate state of affairs, and it troubles me to say the least, because I'm a part of it to a small degree.
If memory serves, this is the first NCAA Football post on these pages this season. This year we've had the nightmare at Penn State (Google "Sandusky Penn State," if you're unfamiliar with it, but be forewarned: You'll regret it), the usual recruiting scandals and finally, conference realignment, wherein my beloved Mizzou Tigers will henceforth be playing in the Southeastern Conference instead of the Big 12, a conference whose roots go back to the turn of the 20th century.
I'm ambivalent about the conference change. There is a century's worth of tradition playing against the schools of Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas and Oklahoma. Heck, even in the early Twentieth Century, the Tigers and Longhorns disappeared into the wilds of Mexico for month doing nothing except playing exhibition football games. No one at either university knew where the hell their teams were.
Of course, it's all about the money, and I know I'm biased, but the responsibility for the break-up falls squarely on the shoulders of the University of Texas. Understand, I don't begrudge it starting it's own sports TV network, nor do I begrudge it keeping all the money, even though the money is/was predicated upon the cooperation of eleven other universities. But by the same token, one cannot behave in this fashion and essentially use the other universities' participation as a cash-cow, and expect them to play along. First, Colorado and Nebraska. Now Texas A&M (the most aggrieved party, in my view) and Mizzou. Don't blame the the latter four institutions for protecting their own interests, just as much as you protected yours.
There is a part of me which saw this coming the moment the former Big Eight Conference merged with four Texas teams of the defunct Southwest Conference. Ultimately, Texas was going to run the show. Now, the chickens are home roosting, and Kansas, Kansas State and Iowa State are looking on helplessly as another Texas team (TCU) joins the conference. Good luck with being the Texas state and Longhorn whipping boys for the foreseeable future.
R. Sherman
Labels: College Football, Current Events, Kansas, KU Snark, Missouri, Mizzou, NCAA, Rants, Sports


15 Comments:
I'm afraid I don't understand it, Randall, and as you know, I live in this country. Maybe I need to re-read it to get exactly what is happening. I understand exactly what is happening at Penn, all too clearly, I'm sorry to say...but this situation that you are writing about just isn't clear to me---I wish it were because it certainly doesn't sound good, at all. It sounds like Greed is involved, once again. Is that the case here? Sorry if I sound stupid and uninforned---I am, I'm afraid.
Author's Note: My European friends and non-sports fans will have no idea what this post is about.
Well I did read it and did get a glimmer but don't ask questions please:)
There are attempts to drive the Uni sports over this side towards that end also as the Admin see it as a huge cash cow. Personally though I just don't see it working in the same way as in the US where Uni sports is largely in lieu city sport like with Man U or our county teams in GAA/UK with cricket.
But in all you written the bit that truly disgusts me is the treatment of those that are drafted only to be spat out once they fail to make the cut or are injured. That's just wrong. And wrong on levels that are hard to plumb.
Is a conference like a league in our money. And once you've won that region you then progress to all-US.
I take no offense, Randall. Partisan Texas fan that I am (of the obnoxious, never-attended-the-school sort, no less), I've never understood the Longhorn Network, even--especially--on the crassest, capitalistic level. Even in Texas, it's barely available. However, I also fully understand why, for symbolic reasons, other schools would be angered by such a thing. It has to be maddening for fans of Texas' opponents to be watching ESPN broadcasts of games in which Texas is playing and see the network shilling for the Longhorn Network ("Keep calling your cable provider!" they urge. How ESPN can sleep at night with a clear conscience is also beyond me; but then again, corporations must be very special kinds of persons.)
But what's really galling to me is the spectacle of watching the Texas-Texas A&M game, the third-oldest sustained college football rivalry in the country, and knowing that due to "my" school's spite this year's game will be the last until, maybe, 2018. "Scheduling conflicts," my, um, eye. It galls because Texas had, in the past, shown such extraordinary loyalty to Texas A&M that I had thought that that loyalty would trump anything else.
Well. As the Brains, via Cyndi Lauper, famously sang, "Money changes everything."
Like you, I've been trying my best not to think about all this and just try to enjoy some football games. It's been hard to do that this year.
Sincere best wishes to Missouri (and the Aggies) in the SEC. I will miss having them both in the conference.
John, my second post is on the demise of the Missouri-KU rivalry, which Turner Gill said, "belongs to the Big XII." Excuse me? This goes back long before the Big XII and to have Kansas pick up its toys and go home is not very becoming.
Cheers.
Yumm...Mo Tiger bait for the Bayou Bengals.
Should've joined the Pac-12/16/18/20. ;-)
UP, surely, you're not an LSU fan. That's like rooting for the Yankees.
Andy, Missouri is not exactly a geographic fit.
Vince, I forgot you up there. University sports, at least in the big two, football and basketball, are big business. It drives everything and alas, we all play along. TV revenues, merchandise, games, etc. It really is a travesty as my prior posts suggest.
As for conferences, yes, they're sort of like that. Conference champions have the chance to play in post season "Bowl Games" which bring in more money. It's not like the World Cup, where a champion is decided via tournament, but the contestants are decided via computers, sportswriters and coaches. Google "BCS criticism" to get an idea.
Cheers.
Yep, and don't call me Shirley.
Hi Randall,
Yep, you're right: this system is difficult to understand, to say the least, for someone not having grown up with football. I remember that from my early days here in Texas I've been wondering about the conferences system and why it's not possible to have something like the Bundesliga in Germany, where all the teams play [home and away] each other twice in a season and thus determine the champion. But of course, there wouldn't be a superbowl then. And the reason that comes to my mind is that the US is simply too big and has too many football teams for the German system to work.
Btw, am I right that the ranking in the conferences is not only determined kind of mathematically by a system of wins vs. losses, but also by ranking of the teams according to their perceived strength/quality? I'm sorry that I can't express myself better here.
Best regards from a soccer fan ;)
Pit
Pit, it depends. With BCS schools, like Texas & Missouri, it's computers and human polls, i.e. the subjective. With smaller schools, it's win/loss records and a tournament at the end of the season. Many, many people would prefer to see the latter system imposed on the bigger schools.
Cheers.
Any post prefaced with "And sometimes certain things must be said" raises anticipation. Oh boy, a rant! As rants go, you were quite contained.
We're diehard UT fans of course, living as we do in the shadow of Austin. But I can't say UT took the best course. Reminded me of the political choice of nationhood vs world view. Seems to me that multi-player card games are more fun than solitaire.
At the same time, you can't be happy about Mizzou's conference choice. Talk about cutting off your nose...Mizzou will have to spend significantly more money on athletics just to be the conference whipping boy.
As to A&M, what can a body say about a school that thinks roasting and eating the other team's mascot is good fun?
Kathleen, thanks for the comment. I agree about moving to the SEC. I'm not thrilled. But then, nobody asked me.
As for A&M's barbecuing a longhorn, frankly, that seems pretty tame, given that we burned Lawrence, KS to the ground in 1864.
Cheers.
Just saying hello. I haven't the teeniest bit of interest in football be it college or NFL. Sorry! Hope all is well Randall. Enjoy the football!
Hi Randall,
Allow me one more heretical view from a soccer fan: why is the game called football when - unless in very rare situation - you're not allowed to touch the ball with your foot?!
Best regards, and have a great Sunday,
Pit
Post a Comment
<< Home